From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Heilbrun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 27, 1990
167 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 27, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.).


Petitioner, as receiver for the Franklin National Bank, commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5225, alleging that a certain transfer of funds from respondent Joseph Heilbrun to his wife, respondent Myrna Heilbrun, was made with an intent to defraud Joseph Heilbrun's creditors, without consideration, rendering Joseph Heilbrun insolvent. Petitioner seeks a personal judgment against Myrna Heilbrun in the amount of its judgment against Joseph Heilbrun, plus interest and attorneys' fees.

Respondent contends that the petition is barred by virtue of the fact that the transferred funds were dissipated by the time this proceeding was commenced. Petitioner does not dispute that the funds were spent, in part in satisfaction of other debts owed by Joseph Heilbrun. We find respondent's position to be unpersuasive. A personal judgment against the transferee of a fraudulent conveyance may be obtained where the transferee has made it impossible to return the property to the creditor by, for example, disposing of wrongfully conveyed property or depreciating it (Marine Midland Bank v. Murkoff, 120 A.D.2d 122, 133, appeal dismissed 69 N.Y.2d 875). A trial is required to determine the extent of respondent's liability, if any.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Heilbrun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 27, 1990
167 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Heilbrun

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Respondent, v. MYRNA HEILBRUN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 27, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 35

Citing Cases

Rockefeller v. Statement Servs., Corp.

Here, the petitioner's submissions established, through a "reverse piercing" of the corporate veil, that…

Wimbledon Fin. Master Fund, Ltd. v. Wimbledon Fund, SPC (Class TT)

There was no such order or judgment here. Additionally, though turnover orders and judgments often result…