From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Federal Deposit Ins. v. 7 Brothers Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1997
237 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 18, 1997.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered May 26, 1995, which, in a mortgage foreclosure action, denied appellant receiver's motion to hold defendants management company and one of its principals in contempt for failure to turn over to him accrued rent money they had collected before his appointment but not paid over to the owner until after his appointment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Rubin, JJ.


The IAS Court correctly held that a receiver is not entitled to accrued rent paid by a tenant to a managing agent before the receiver's appointment, even though not actually received by the landlord at the time of the appointment ( Kane Assocs. v Blumenson, 30 AD2d 127, affd 23 NY2d 942). We have considered the receiver's other arguments and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Federal Deposit Ins. v. 7 Brothers Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 1997
237 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Federal Deposit Ins. v. 7 Brothers Constr

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. 7 BROTHERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
654 N.Y.S.2d 761

Citing Cases

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. 7 Bros. Constr. Corp.

Decided December 2, 1997 Appeal from (1st Dept: 237 A.D.2d 167) FINALITY OF JUDGMENTS AND…

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Brown & East Ridge Partners

The holding in National Missions rests upon the union of two established legal rules. The first, specifically…