From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Federal Bake Shop v. Unrue

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 8, 1967
196 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 36012.

March 8, 1967.

Writ of certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

B.C. Pyle, of Whittaker, Pyle Wood, Orlando, for petitioners.

Charles J. Luke, II, Daytona Beach, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 17, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of an attorney's fee is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Federal Bake Shop v. Unrue

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 8, 1967
196 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

Federal Bake Shop v. Unrue

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL BAKE SHOP AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT INDEMNITY CO., PETITIONERS, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 8, 1967

Citations

196 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1967)