From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feder v. Greco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1997
240 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 2, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The undisputed facts, as testified to by the defendant Joseph Greco at his examination before trial, establish that Greco, as he was making a left turn across a southbound road, was struck by the plaintiffs' vehicle, which was travelling on the southbound road. Although Groucho testified that he did not see the plaintiffs' car, which "came out of nowhere", he also testified that the plaintiffs' car struck his vehicle approximately one second after he started to turn, when he was only about five feet into the intersection.

Under such circumstances, Greco was clearly negligent in failing to see that which, under the facts and circumstances, he should have seen by the proper use of his senses. Accordingly, we agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs are entitled to partial summary judgment on the issue of liability (see, Burns v. Mastroianni, 173 A.D.2d 754; McGraw v. Ranieri, 202 A.D.2d 725).

Copertino, J.P., Thompson, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Feder v. Greco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1997
240 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Feder v. Greco

Case Details

Full title:SHARON FEDER et al., Respondents, v. JOSEPH GRECO et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 364 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 111

Citing Cases

Zambrano v. Pilhwan Seok

Under these circumstances, Zambrano was clearly negligent in failing to see that which he should have seen by…

Walia v. Junqueira

The fact that Paulo's view was obstructed was not a justification for his failure to yield (see Gandolfo v…