From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fedder v. Addus Healthcare, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 6, 2014
574 U.S. 922 (2014)

Summary

noting that courts "routinely discount" the "'stray remarks' of non-decisionmakers . . . as proof of an employer's alleged animus"

Summary of this case from Schneider v. Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc.

Opinion

No. 13-1398.

10-06-2014

Richard S. FEDDER, petitioner, v. ADDUS HEALTHCARE, INC., et al.


Motion of Equal Rights Advocates, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Fedder v. Addus Healthcare, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 6, 2014
574 U.S. 922 (2014)

noting that courts "routinely discount" the "'stray remarks' of non-decisionmakers . . . as proof of an employer's alleged animus"

Summary of this case from Schneider v. Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc.
Case details for

Fedder v. Addus Healthcare, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Richard S. FEDDER, petitioner, v. ADDUS HEALTHCARE, INC., et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 6, 2014

Citations

574 U.S. 922 (2014)
135 S. Ct. 83
190 L. Ed. 2d 230
83 U.S.L.W. 3159

Citing Cases

Schneider v. Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc.

Because Hudson was not involved with the decision to terminate Schneider, his stray comment about…