FEDD v. OWENS

Full title: FRANK SOLOMON FEDD, SR., Plaintiff, v. BRIAN OWENS, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division

Date published: Sep 17, 2010

Case No. 1:09-cv-52 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 17, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-52 (WLS).

September 17, 2010

ORDER

W. SANDS, Chief Judge

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed August 24, 2010. (Doc. 86). It is recommended that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 21, 32) be GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 58) be DENIED. (Doc. 86).

The Report and Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days¹ from the date of its service to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id.). The period for filing objections expired on Monday, September 13, 2010;² no objections have been filed to date. ( See Docket).

1 The Parties were given an additional three days because service was made by mail. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(d) (adding three days to specified period within which a party may act if service is made under Rule 5(b)(2)(C) by mailing process to a party's last known address).

2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(2), because the actual deadline for filing objections — Saturday, September 11, 2010 — fell on a weekend, the deadline was extended to Monday, September 13, 2010. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a)(2).

Upon full review and consideration of the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 86) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 21, 32) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 58) for injunctive relief is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 17^th day of September, 2010.