From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Wellington Investments, L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-13325 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-13325

06-25-2012

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a corporation existing under the laws of the United States, Plaintiff, v. WELLINGTON INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability company, and MARK A. WHITE, a Michigan citizen, Defendants.

Dennis J. Levasseur (P39778) Carl T. Rashid (P66064) Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association SULLIVAN WARD ASHER & PATTON, P.C. Kevin S. Toll (P69611) Sheri B. Cataldo (P39276) Kevin S. Toll (P69611) Attorneys for Defendants Wellington Investments, LLC and Mark A. White


Hon. Marianne O. Battani

Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO

COMPEL DISCOVERY AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

Plaintiff having filed a motion to compel discovery (ECF No. 19) and defendants having filed a motion to compel discovery (ECF No. 17), the parties having filed response briefs in opposition and replies in support of the respective motions (ECF Nos. 22, 26, 27 & 28), a hearing having been held on June 14, 2012, and this Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff and defendants shall withdraw their objections that the opposing party submitted more than twenty five interrogatories. Plaintiff will answer defendants' Interrogatory Nos. 16, 17, and 18. Defendants shall withdraw their objections from each and will answer plaintiff's requests that ask defendants to identify and/or describe documents that support its answers (Interrogatory Nos. 3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25). Finally, no more interrogatories are allowed by any party.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall supplement its answers to defendants' Interrogatory Nos. 2, 8, 9, and 13 by providing information known to the plaintiff.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff does not have to produce a copy of the appraisal requested in defendants' Document Request No. 4. Plaintiff does have to respond to defendants' Interrogatory No. 6 by stating the purchase price.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall supplement answers to plaintiff's Interrogatory Nos. 12 through 25 by explaining the factual basis for their affirmative defenses.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall supplement answers to plaintiff's Interrogatory Nos. 8, 10 and 11 and Document Request Nos. 1 and 5. At a minimum, defendants shall produce the management agreement, retainer agreement, and rent checks, to the extent the rent checks are in defendants' possession, custody or subject to its control.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall withdraw their objections to plaintiff's Document Request Nos. 3, 5, 8 and 9.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that no costs or fees are awarded to either party.

______________

Mark A. Randon

United States Magistrate Judge

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the parties of record on this date, June 25, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Melody Miles

Case Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BODMAN PLC

______________

Dennis J. Levasseur (P39778)

Carl T. Rashid (P66064)

Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal National

Mortgage Association

SULLIVAN WARD ASHER & PATTON,

P.C.

Kevin S. Toll (P69611)

Sheri B. Cataldo (P39276)

Kevin S. Toll (P69611)

Attorneys for Defendants Wellington

Investments, LLC and Mark A. White


Summaries of

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Wellington Investments, L.L.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-13325 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Wellington Investments, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a corporation existing under the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-13325 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2012)