From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Golden Key Realty & Mortg. Banker, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 8, 2011
Case No. C10-04285 BZ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C10-04285 BZ

11-08-2011

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, In Its Capacity as Receiver forNetBank,FSB, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN KEY REALTY & MORTGAGE BANKER, INC., a California corporation, SAMUEL GBILIA, an individual, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, STEWART TITLE OF SACRAMENTO, a California corporation, Defendants.

RUDOW LAW GROUP, LLC William Rudow David Fleck Penny Alafassos Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP Jeffrey H. Lowenthal Edward Egan Smith Robert W. Biederman Attorneys for Defendant First American Title Insurance Company MATHENY, SEARS, LINKERT & JAIME Matthew C. Jaime N. Kate Jeffries Attorneys for Stewart Title of Sacramento


Jeffrey H. Lowenthal (State Bar No. 111763)

Edward Egan Smith (State Bar No. 169792)

Robert W. Biederman (State Bar No. 177321)

STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS

ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP

One California Street, Third Floor

San Francisco, California 94111

Attorneys for Defendant

First American Title Insurance Company

STIPULATION TO EXTEND ORDER

SCHEDULING JURY TRIAL AND

PRETRIAL MATTERS

Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), Defendant First American Title Insurance Company ("First American"), and Defendant Stewart Title of Sacramento ("Stewart Title") enter into this Stipulation to Extend Order Scheduling Jury Trial And Pretrial Matters ("Scheduling Order") (Docket no. 45):

1. The parties have been actively involved in discovery in the above case.

2. The FDIC and First American are in the process of scheduling and taking depositions. There is a tentative settlement between Stewart Title and FDIC.

3. The FDIC and First American conducted a mediation, which did not resolve their dispute.

4. Because most of the persons to be deposed are third-party witnesses who worked for companies that are no longer in existence including Alliance Title Company and Meritage Mortgage Corporation, there are difficulties locating such persons to serve subpoenas for depositions and scheduling their depositions. To date, the FDIC has issued subpoenas for the depositions of ten (10) witnesses.

5. Due to the above logistical difficulties, the parties agree, subject to court approval, to a sixty (60) day extension of the dates in the Scheduling Order as set forth below.

6. Prior to this Stipulation, there have been no modifications of the deadlines in the Scheduling Order.

7. The parties agree, subject to Court approval, to the following extensions of the Scheduling Order:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event ¦Present Date ¦New Date ¦ +----------------------------+-----------------------+------------------------¦ ¦Trial Date ¦May 7, 2012 8:30 a.m. 2¦July 9, 2012, 8:30 am. 2¦ ¦ ¦weeks ¦weeks ¦ +----------------------------+-----------------------+------------------------¦ ¦Pre-Trial Conference ¦April 17, 2012, 4:00 ¦June 19, 2012, 4:00 p.m.¦ ¦ ¦p.m. ¦ ¦ +----------------------------+-----------------------+------------------------¦ ¦Last Day to File Dispositive¦March 7, 2012 ¦May 7, 2012 ¦ ¦Motions ¦ ¦ ¦ +----------------------------+-----------------------+------------------------¦ ¦Last Date for Expert ¦February 3,2012 ¦April 3, 2012 ¦ ¦Discovery ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Last Day for Rebuttal Expert Disclosure¦January 27, 2012¦March 27, 2012¦ +---------------------------------------+----------------+--------------¦ ¦Last Day for Expert Disclosure ¦January 20, 2012¦March 20, 2012¦ +---------------------------------------+----------------+--------------¦ ¦Close of Non-Expert Discovery ¦January 13, 2012¦March 13,2012 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

RUDOW LAW GROUP, LLC

William Rudow

David Fleck

Penny Alafassos

Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance

Corporation

STEYER LOWENTHAL BOODROOKAS

ALVAREZ & SMITH LLP

Jeffrey H. Lowenthal

Edward Egan Smith

Robert W. Biederman

Attorneys for Defendant

First American Title Insurance Company

MATHENY, SEARS, LINKERT & JAIME

Matthew C. Jaime

N. Kate Jeffries

Attorneys for Stewart Title of Sacramento

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. IT 18 SO ORDERED.

Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Golden Key Realty & Mortg. Banker, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 8, 2011
Case No. C10-04285 BZ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Golden Key Realty & Mortg. Banker, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, In Its Capacity as Receiver…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 8, 2011

Citations

Case No. C10-04285 BZ (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)