Opinion
CASE NO. 11-03279-LHK
10-14-2011
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. Plaintiff(s), v. Boris Frankel, an individual and dba Appraisal Choice, et al. Defendant(s).
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[×] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
[×] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties will participate in private mediation. Mediator to be selected and mediation completed by February 27, 2012.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[×] other requested deadline February 27, 2012
_______________
Attorney for Plaintiff
_______________
Attorney for Defendant
Frenkel
_______________
Attorney for Defendant Furman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. Plaintiff(s),
v.
Boris Frankel, an individual and dba Appraisal Choice, et al. Defendant(s).
CASE NO. 11-032794JTK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R, 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (EN.E) (ADR L.R. 5)
［［[×] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR. phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
[×] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties will participate in private mediation. Mediator to be selected and mediation completed by February 27, 2012.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[×] other requested deadline February 27, 2012
_______________
Attorney for Plaintiff
_______________
Attorney for Defendant
Frenkel
_______________
Attorney for Defendant Furman
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
[] Non-binding Arbitration
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[×] Mediation
[] Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
[] 90 days from the date of this order.IT IS SO ORDERED.
[×] other February 27, 2012
_______________
UNITED STATES JUDGE