From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Febles v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 2005
15 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5355N

February 10, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Salerno, J.), entered May 13, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the infant plaintiff's motion pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Sweeny, JJ., concur.


The IAS court properly exercised its discretion in granting the infant plaintiff's timely motion for leave to file a late notice of claim. Although no specific excuse was offered for the delay, that circumstance was properly found nondispositive given the moving plaintiff's infancy during the relevant period and the absence of prejudice to defendants ( see Ali v. Bunny Realty Corp., 253 AD2d 356). Defendants, we note, had actual notice of the alleged defect, which was identified on the Big Apple Map 10 months prior to the accident. Moreover, the alleged defect is apparently permanent, and can still be inspected.

We have reviewed defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Febles v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 2005
15 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Febles v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON FEBLES et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 482

Citing Cases

Pena v. City of New York

While Peña has not offered an excuse for his delay, his serving of a notice of claim less than four months…

Diaz v. City of New York

The court can grant an extension of time to serve a notice of claim if the Plaintiff was an infant during the…