From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

F.E.A., Inc. v. Does 1-100

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CV-01562 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-01562 JAM GGH

07-20-2012

F.E.A., INC., Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-100, JANE DOES 1-100 AND XYZ COMPANY, Defendants.

Cara R. Burns (SBN: 137557) Hicks, Mims, Kaplan & Burns Attorneys for Plaintiff, F.E.A., INC.


Cara R. Burns (SBN: 137557)

Hicks, Mims, Kaplan & Burns

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

F.E.A., INC.

ORDER FOR DISPOSITION OF

SEIZED GOODS

Plaintiff having dismissed the above entitled action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41 (a), and no defendants having appeared by answer or otherwise, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff is authorized to destroy or otherwise dispose of all infringing merchandise.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 20, 2012

At: 2:30 p.m.

_________________________

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Presented By:

_________________________

Cara R. Burns (SBN: 137557)

Hicks, Mims, Kaplan & Burns

3250 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 350

Santa Monica, California 90405

Tel: (310) 314-1721;Fax: (310) 314-1725

cburns@hmkblawyers.com


Summaries of

F.E.A., Inc. v. Does 1-100

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 20, 2012
Case No. 2:11-CV-01562 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)
Case details for

F.E.A., Inc. v. Does 1-100

Case Details

Full title:F.E.A., INC., Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOES 1-100, JANE DOES 1-100 AND XYZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 20, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-01562 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2012)