From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fazzano v. Zoning Bd. of Warwick

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jan 6, 1967
225 A.2d 217 (R.I. 1967)

Opinion

January 6, 1967.

PRESENT: Roberts, C.J., Paolino, Powers, Joslin and Kelleher, JJ.

CERTIORARI. Form of Judgment. Zoning Cases. In common-law certiorari the only judgment is to quash the writ or the record. In the latter instance the inferior tribunal will not be directed to make a new record. In zoning matters statutory certiorari may allow for relief broader in scope, but court's mandate would not, in the absence of a precedent, be here enlarged to authorize the applicant to file anew under ordinance as it existed prior to amendment.

CERTIORARI by remonstrants, heard and granted, decision of respondent board quashed, and records ordered returned to board with decision endorsed thereon.

Coffey, Ward, McGovern and Novogroski, Charles J. McGovern, for petitioners.

James R. Morriss, City Solicitor, Howard R. Haronian, Assistant City Solicitor, for respondent.


This is a petition for certiorari brought by two remonstrants to review a decision of the zoning board granting the applicant relief from the minimum lot width requirements of the zoning ordinance and thereby permitting the construction of two duplex dwellings on property located in a resident A-7 zone. That use, although permitted in a district A-7 zone in 1961 when this application was filed, is no longer allowed under the ordinance as now amended. At the hearing before us the applicant did not request leave to intervene and the board defended. They concede that their earlier action was a nullity and agree with the petitioners' contention that their decision must be quashed. They suggest, however, that in the interests of achieving substantial justice we so fashion our mandate as to permit the applicant, if it offers the city the cul-de-sac abutting the property as a street, to file anew under the ordinance as it was in 1961.

In common-law certiorari the only judgment is to quash either the writ or the record. In the latter instance the inferior tribunal will not be directed to make a new record. Newport Poster Advertising Co. v. City Council, 84 R.I. 155; Ferris, Extraordinary Legal Remedies, § 185, p. 213. While the scope of the relief which may be ordered is broader in zoning matters where certiorari is statutory, the board has failed to direct our attention to any instance where the judgment we have ordered has been extended to the limits now suggested. In the circumstances, the decision of the board must be quashed.

The petition for certiorari is granted, the decision of the zoning board of review is quashed, and the records certified to this court are ordered returned to the respondent board with our decision endorsed thereon.


Summaries of

Fazzano v. Zoning Bd. of Warwick

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jan 6, 1967
225 A.2d 217 (R.I. 1967)
Case details for

Fazzano v. Zoning Bd. of Warwick

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS A. FAZZANO et ux. vs. ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF THE CITY OF WARWICK

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Jan 6, 1967

Citations

225 A.2d 217 (R.I. 1967)
225 A.2d 217

Citing Cases

Jacques v. Mosca

Even if we were of a mind to issue the writ we could not grant the petitioner's request for a pre-primary…