From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fayed v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 16, 2023
2:21-CV-2141-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-CV-2141-DMC-P

02-16-2023

JAMES MICHAEL FAYED, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. See ECF No. 29. Because no answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed, leave of Court is not required and the action is dismissed on Plaintiff's notice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fayed v. Allison

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 16, 2023
2:21-CV-2141-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Fayed v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MICHAEL FAYED, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 16, 2023

Citations

2:21-CV-2141-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2023)