From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FAY v. MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1896
2 App. Div. 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

March Term, 1896.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Barrett, Rumsey, Williams and Patterson, JJ.


Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event. —


We are all of opinion that the evidence in this case is entirely insufficient to sustain the decision and judgment. A new trial must be awarded because the evidence is not of such a character as would justify a modification. The weight of evidence is so greatly in favor of the defendants that we must either dismiss the complaint or award a new trial. As the plaintiff may be able to make out a stronger case upon another hearing the latter course should be adopted. The judgment will, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event,


Summaries of

FAY v. MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 1896
2 App. Div. 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for

FAY v. MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:Patrick H. Fay, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1896

Citations

2 App. Div. 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)