From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Favors v. Walgreen Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 9, 1990
557 So. 2d 951 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1598.

March 9, 1990.

Appeal from the Judge of Compensation Claims, Joseph F. Hand.

Emil Jaczynski, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Anthony J. Beisler, III, of Beisler Beisler, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.


Vivian Favors, claimant, appeals from a final workers' compensation order denying her claim for full-time attendant care, payment for retroactive attendant care, attorney's fees, and costs. We reverse for the following reasons.

The record does not support the judge of compensation claims's finding that claimant was entitled to future attendant care benefits in the amount of only two hours per day. The uncontroverted evidence established that claimant has been required to use a wheelchair since August 1988 and that she needs at least four hours' attendant care per day. The record also fails to support the judge's finding that there was no evidence that employer and carrier should have known to provide attendant care to claimant prior to her filing a claim for such benefits. The record shows that the carrier authorized the wheelchair pursuant to claimant's authorized physician's prescription for her in August 1988. This notice gave rise to an obligation on the part of employer and carrier to properly and diligently investigate the facts to determine whether claimant was wheelchair bound and needed any form of attendant care. Cf. Walt Disney World v. Harrison, 443 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Since the uncontroverted evidence shows that claimant has needed a wheelchair since August 22, 1988, and that she needs attendant care for at least four hours per day, we reverse with directions that the judge of compensation claims order employer and carrier to pay claimant retroactive attendant care benefits and provide future attendant care benefits. The amount of future care to be authorized shall be redetermined by the judge, but in no event shall it be less than four hours per day.

The denial of attorney's fees and costs to claimant is reversed, as she is entitled to such fees and costs under section 440.34(3) and 440.34(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1987).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Favors v. Walgreen Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 9, 1990
557 So. 2d 951 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Favors v. Walgreen Co.

Case Details

Full title:VIVIAN FAVORS, APPELLANT, v. WALGREEN COMPANY AND TRAVELERS INSURANCE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 9, 1990

Citations

557 So. 2d 951 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Smith v. DRW Realty Services

Despite these facts and circumstances, the employer/carrier concedes that it performed no investigation to…

Doctors Hosp. v. Billings

The JCC specifically rejected appellants' contention that they were unaware of claimant's need for attendant…