From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Favor v. Harper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 21, 2017
Case No. CV 17-0165-JGB (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-0165-JGB (JEM)

03-21-2017

BRANDON FAVOR, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HARPER, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DEEMING PETITIONERAVEXATIOUS LITIGANT

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation ofthe United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Petitioner Brandon Favor is deemed a vexatious litigant.

(2) The Clerk of the Court shall not file any of the following documents from Favor: (a) civil complaint; (b) habeas petition; (c) IFP application; or (4) document in a case that is closed and final unless Favor has submitted a motion for leave to file the document and a Judge of this Court has granted the leave requested.

(3) Favor must submit a copy of this vexatious litigant order and a copy of the proposed filing with any motion seeking leave of court to file a civil complaint, habeas petition, IFP application, or document in a case that is closed and final. DATED: March 21, 2017

/s/_________

JESUS G. BERNAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Favor v. Harper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 21, 2017
Case No. CV 17-0165-JGB (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Favor v. Harper

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON FAVOR, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HARPER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 21, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 17-0165-JGB (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2017)