From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Favila v. Walgreen Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 28, 2024
3:23-cv-06559-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-06559-JD

03-28-2024

BLANCA FAVILA, Plaintiff, v. WALGREEN CO., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 21, 2024, the Court held a regularly noticed case management conference. Counsel for both parties did not appear at the conference. Dkt. No. 13. The absences were unexcused.

These defaults unduly burden the Court, and needlessly multiply the proceedings in this case. Favila's counsel of record, Benjamin D. Nielsen, and Walgreen's counsel of record, Adriana Maria Rivero Garcia, are directed to show cause in writing why the Court should not impose professional conduct sanctions on them, or monetary or other sanctions. Responses to this order must be filed by April 12, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Favila v. Walgreen Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 28, 2024
3:23-cv-06559-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Favila v. Walgreen Co.

Case Details

Full title:BLANCA FAVILA, Plaintiff, v. WALGREEN CO., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 28, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-06559-JD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2024)