From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faver v. Thylin Steel Co.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Jan 13, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 201 (N.Y. Misc. 1959)

Summary

In Faver v. Thylin Steel Co. (19 Misc.2d 201 -202 [Sup. Ct., Kings County]) Mr. Justice SCHWARTZWALD discussed the question of exchange of medical reports, and while denying the application of defendant that an exchange be directed, pointed out the new rule XII of the New York County Trial Term Rules. The court in the Faver case, however, also pointed up the fact that defendant is not left in the dark as to plaintiff's claim of injuries and this proposition will be discussed hereinafter.

Summary of this case from Donovan v. Albano Trucking Corp.

Opinion

January 13, 1959

Nathan Gross for plaintiff.

Thomas F. Keane for Thylin Steel Co., Inc., defendant.

Bivin Welch for Willowfodo Nieves, defendant.


Motion for an order directing the defendants to serve upon the attorney for the plaintiff an exact copy of the report or reports of Dr. Leon Singerman, a physician employed by the defendants and who examined the plaintiff on the 17th day of October, 1958, is granted as to the defendant Thylin Steel Co. Inc. ( Gooch v. Blanch, 14 Misc.2d 396; Horn v. McCarrell, N.Y.L.J., Dec. 9, 1958, p. 14, col. 6). The court has read with interest the statement of defendant's counsel, to wit, "if the court feels in the interests of justice and expediency such report should be made available to the plaintiff by the defendant then your deponent respectfully requests that any reports of medical examinations had on behalf of the plaintiff by the plaintiff be made available to the defendant." As is indicated above, the plaintiff is by rule required to give the defendant authority to examine the records of the hospital in which the plaintiff was confined and, also, in seeking a preference under rule 9, the plaintiff is required to submit either a doctor's affidavit or a copy of the hospital report, so that actually the defendant does get the plaintiff's doctor's report and, carrying these rules to their logical conclusion, upon a proper application for specific reports of plaintiff's doctor, such relief might be granted. The motion is denied as to the defendant Nieves.

As further evidence of the trend in accordance with the above, the court wishes to point out the new rule XII of the New York County Trial Term Rules adopted in the First Department on December 19, 1958.

Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Faver v. Thylin Steel Co.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Jan 13, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 201 (N.Y. Misc. 1959)

In Faver v. Thylin Steel Co. (19 Misc.2d 201 -202 [Sup. Ct., Kings County]) Mr. Justice SCHWARTZWALD discussed the question of exchange of medical reports, and while denying the application of defendant that an exchange be directed, pointed out the new rule XII of the New York County Trial Term Rules. The court in the Faver case, however, also pointed up the fact that defendant is not left in the dark as to plaintiff's claim of injuries and this proposition will be discussed hereinafter.

Summary of this case from Donovan v. Albano Trucking Corp.
Case details for

Faver v. Thylin Steel Co.

Case Details

Full title:ALEX FAVER, Plaintiff, v. THYLIN STEEL CO. INC., et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County

Date published: Jan 13, 1959

Citations

19 Misc. 2d 201 (N.Y. Misc. 1959)
191 N.Y.S.2d 598

Citing Cases

Donovan v. Albano Trucking Corp.

Mr. Justice BAILEY in the Supreme Court, Westchester County in Betz v. Cullen (N.Y.L.J., Jan. 21, 1959, p.…