From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faust v. Vill. of Rye Brook

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 66979 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

Motion No 2021-04893 Index No. 51279/2019

06-06-2022

Deborah M. Faust, et al., respondents, v. Village of Rye Brook, defendant, County of Westchester, appellant.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

M283305

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., MARK C. DILLON, BETSY BARROS, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 9, 2021. Motion by the appellant to extend the time to serve and file a reply brief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, and on or before June 21, 2022, the appellant shall serve and file the reply brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the reply brief and upload a digital copy of the reply brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website; and it is further, ORDERED that no further extension of time shall be granted.

LASALLE, P.J., DILLON, BARROS, CONNOLLY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Faust v. Vill. of Rye Brook

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 66979 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Faust v. Vill. of Rye Brook

Case Details

Full title:Deborah M. Faust, et al., respondents, v. Village of Rye Brook, defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 66979 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)