From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faust v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 1, 1991
573 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-01757.

February 1, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Richard A. Luce, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol M. Dittmar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant contends that his convictions for possession and purchases of cocaine were based upon the same quantity of cocaine and so are improper under V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). We are unable to consider this argument because the appellant pled guilty to the charges. See Ford v. State, 556 So.2d 483 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant to raise this issue by collateral review. In the remaining cases on appeal, the appellant's judgments and sentences are affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Faust v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 1, 1991
573 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Faust v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD NATHANIEL FAUST, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 1, 1991

Citations

573 So. 2d 448 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)