From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faust v. Jun

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 23, 2017
14-CV-6702 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2017)

Opinion

14-CV-6702

03-23-2017

DWAYNE FAUST, Plaintiff, v. DR. YOUNG JUN, et al., Defendants.


DECISION & ORDER

Currently before the Court is plaintiff's motion to strike affirmative defenses contained in defendants' answer (Docket # 32). Since the filing of plaintiff's motion, the defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment (Docket # 52) for dismissal of plaintiff's claims on the basis of the defenses asserted in defendants' answer and at issue in plaintiff's motion to strike. In other words, the subject of plaintiff's motion to strike is being litigated and will be decided by Judge Geraci in the pending motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to strike (Docket # 32) is denied without prejudice to renew.

/s/_________

JONATHAN W. FELDMAN

United States Magistrate Judge Dated: March 23, 2017

Rochester, New York


Summaries of

Faust v. Jun

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 23, 2017
14-CV-6702 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Faust v. Jun

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE FAUST, Plaintiff, v. DR. YOUNG JUN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 23, 2017

Citations

14-CV-6702 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2017)