From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fausett v. LeBlanc

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jan 10, 2011
No. 2:08-CV-1724-RLH VPC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:08-CV-1724-RLH VPC.

January 10, 2011


ORDER (Motion for Enlargement of Time — #113)


Before the Court is Plaintiff's "Ex-Pedited" Notice of Motion and Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to File Plaintiff's Opposition to the Defendants' Summary Judgment (#113, filed January 3, 2011). Defendants have responded with a Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a 30-day Extension (#115, filed January 6, 2011) in they are granted the same courtesy. Given the multitude of motions, and for the reasons stated in Plaintiff's Motion and Defendants conditional non-opposition, and for good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is granted, and he is granted a 30-day extension, from the day his opposition is presently due, in which to file his opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are also given a 30-day extension, from January 13, 2011, in which to file oppositions to Plaintiff's three separate motions for summary judgment.

Dated: January 7, 2011.


Summaries of

Fausett v. LeBlanc

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jan 10, 2011
No. 2:08-CV-1724-RLH VPC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Fausett v. LeBlanc

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL FAUSETT, Plaintiff(s), v. REGISTERED NURSE LeBLANC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Jan 10, 2011

Citations

No. 2:08-CV-1724-RLH VPC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2011)