From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faulk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 24, 1991
573 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-505.

January 24, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County; Belvin Perry, Jr., Judge.

Wafford H. Stidham of Boswell, Stidham, Conner Wilson, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the conviction of appellant and certify the same question we certified in Armstrong v. State, 566 So.2d 943 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) as being of great public importance.

DOES TRIAL COUNSEL FOR A DEFENDANT WAIVE FOR HIS CLIENT FUTURE OBJECTION TO FAILURE TO GIVE THE FULL AND COMPLETE INITIAL INSTRUCTION ON JUSTIFIABLE AND EXCUSABLE HOMICIDE AS PART OF THE MANSLAUGHTER INSTRUCTION WHEN THE TRIAL ATTORNEY SPECIFICALLY REQUESTS AN ABBREVIATED INSTRUCTION, WHICH OTHERWISE WOULD CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, J., and FOWLER, R.J., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Faulk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 24, 1991
573 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Faulk v. State

Case Details

Full title:DURWARD SPENCE FAULK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 24, 1991

Citations

573 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Logan v. State

This court has held that the error may be waived if defense counsel specifically requests an abbreviated…