From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faulk v. Aware

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 1, 1964
202 N.E.2d 372 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Submitted September 28, 1964

Decided October 1, 1964


Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellants contended that their utterances were privileged and protected under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, as interpreted in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ( 376 U.S. 254). The Court of Appeals passed upon this question and held that appellants enjoyed no such privilege under the Constitution of the United States.


Summaries of

Faulk v. Aware

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 1, 1964
202 N.E.2d 372 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

Faulk v. Aware

Case Details

Full title:JOHN H. FAULK, Respondent, v. AWARE, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 1, 1964

Citations

202 N.E.2d 372 (N.Y. 1964)
202 N.E.2d 372
253 N.Y.S.2d 990

Citing Cases

Pearson v. Fairbanks Publishing Co.

.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686, 706-707 (1964). For cases which have discussed application of the Sullivan rule…

Pauling v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Company

There are, of course, fact situations where the courts understandably have refused to apply the principle.…