From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fattig v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 26, 2014
439 S.W.3d 268 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. WD 77054.

08-26-2014

Anthony FATTIG, Appellant v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Damien DeLoyola, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Evan Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.


Damien DeLoyola, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Evan Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Division One: MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge, LISA WHITE HARDWICK and KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judges.

Order

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Fattig appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief due to abandonment. Fattig contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because the court failed to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Fattig v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 26, 2014
439 S.W.3d 268 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Fattig v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony FATTIG, Appellant v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 26, 2014

Citations

439 S.W.3d 268 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014)