From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fatjo v. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Feb 28, 2018
No. 04-17-00566-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 28, 2018)

Opinion

No. 04-17-00566-CV

02-28-2018

Tom FATJO, Jr., Appellant v. ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas
Trial Court No. 15425A
Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Fatjo v. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Feb 28, 2018
No. 04-17-00566-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Fatjo v. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP

Case Details

Full title:Tom FATJO, Jr., Appellant v. ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Feb 28, 2018

Citations

No. 04-17-00566-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 28, 2018)