From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FATH v. BOROUGH OF CORAOPOLIS

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 28, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-1216 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1216.

January 28, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration [Doc. No. 40] regarding its motion to compel [Doc. No. 19] and defendants' response thereto [Doc. No. 50], IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the "reasonable time" standard set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), plaintiff's motion is DENIED as untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that even if plaintiff's motion for reconsideration was timely, plaintiff's motion would be denied because plaintiff has failed to set forth new facts or evidence that would justify the court's reconsideration of its decision on this motion.


Summaries of

FATH v. BOROUGH OF CORAOPOLIS

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 28, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-1216 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2010)
Case details for

FATH v. BOROUGH OF CORAOPOLIS

Case Details

Full title:SALLY A. FATH, Administratix of the Estate of ROGER W. FATH, Deceased…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 28, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-1216 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2010)