From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fatani v. Arnet

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Jul 16, 2009
Case No. 2:08-CV-303 (D. Utah Jul. 16, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-CV-303.

July 16, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on February 24, 2009, recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, deny Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Process, and deem as moot Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. These recommendations are made on the bases that Plaintiff has failed to provide enough information to support a cognizable claim and because counsel has already assisted Plaintiff in this case.

Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Process, deems Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel as MOOT, and DISMISSES Plaintiff's case.


Summaries of

Fatani v. Arnet

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Jul 16, 2009
Case No. 2:08-CV-303 (D. Utah Jul. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Fatani v. Arnet

Case Details

Full title:MAFOA E.L. FATANI, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS ARNET et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Jul 16, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:08-CV-303 (D. Utah Jul. 16, 2009)