affirming dismissal of inmate's postconviction action under chapter 822
Summary of this case from Belk v. StateNo. 15–0816.
06-29-2016
Mark Donnell FASSETT, Applicant–Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent–Appellee.
Leslie M. Blair III of Blair & Fitzsimmons, P.C., Dubuque, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Bridget A. Chambers, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State.
Affirmed.
affirming dismissal of inmate's postconviction action under chapter 822
Summary of this case from Belk v. Statediscussing district court’s jurisdiction versus its authority over certain matters and finding district court correctly concluded the inmate "could not proceed under chapter 822 and should instead seek relief under chapter 17A," which provides for pursing administrative remedies
Summary of this case from Shelton v. StateFull title:Mark Donnell FASSETT, Applicant–Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa…
Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Date published: Jun 29, 2016
Therefore, on this basis alone, the action is denied.Given that Shelton’s original motion was not brought…
Belk v. StateI would affirm the district court's dismissal on grounds that Laverne Belk sued under the wrong statute and…