From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fason v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 20, 2021
326 So. 3d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

NO. 2D20-1444

10-20-2021

Samuel FASON, Appellant, v. STATE of FloridA, Appellee.

Jonathan Edwin Mills, Orlando, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Suzanne C. Bechard, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Jonathan Edwin Mills, Orlando, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Suzanne C. Bechard, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KELLY, Judge.

For the reasons expressed in Morgan v. State , 293 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted , No. SC20-641, 2020 WL 3494396 (Fla. June 29, 2020), we affirm. As in Morgan , we certify conflict with the Fourth and Fifth District Courts of Appeal in Jones v. State , 279 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019), and Magill v. State , 287 So. 3d 1262 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

MORRIS, C.J., and SMITH, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Fason v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Oct 20, 2021
326 So. 3d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Fason v. State

Case Details

Full title:Samuel FASON, Appellant, v. STATE of FloridA, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Oct 20, 2021

Citations

326 So. 3d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)