From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fasciana-Mastellar v. Backus

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Jul 31, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 5893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

484 CAF 17-01478

07-31-2019

IN THE MATTER OF CIARA C. FASCIANA-MASTELLAR, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BRANDYN L. BACKUS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. DAVID K. ETTMAN, SENECA FALLS, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. DONNA M. CATHY, WATERLOO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.


PRESENT:

CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

DAVID K. ETTMAN, SENECA FALLS, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

DONNA M. CATHY, WATERLOO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Seneca County (Stephen D. Aronson, A.J.), entered April 12, 2017 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, modified respondent's visitation schedule with the subject child.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Gilroy v Backus (— AD3d — [July 31, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).

Entered: July 31, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Fasciana-Mastellar v. Backus

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Jul 31, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 5893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Fasciana-Mastellar v. Backus

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CIARA C. FASCIANA-MASTELLAR, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Jul 31, 2019

Citations

2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 5893 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)