From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farthing v. Godfrey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 30, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:19CV195-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 30, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:19CV195-HEH

07-30-2019

SEAUN FARTHING, Plaintiff, v. LT. I. GODFREY, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on May 6, 2019, the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $11.66 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Thereafter, on May 30, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff a fifteen (15) day extension of time to pay the filing fee.

More than fifteen (15) days have elapsed and Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's disregard of the Court's directives warrants dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: July 30, 2019
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Farthing v. Godfrey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jul 30, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:19CV195-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Farthing v. Godfrey

Case Details

Full title:SEAUN FARTHING, Plaintiff, v. LT. I. GODFREY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jul 30, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:19CV195-HEH (E.D. Va. Jul. 30, 2019)