From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farsura v. QC Terme U.S. Corp

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 2022
21-cv-9030 (AT) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-9030 (AT) (RWL)

07-28-2022

STEFANO FARSURA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QC TERME UC CORP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

As discussed during the discovery conference held via Teams on July 28, 2022:

1. By [10 days], Defendant shall file a pleading with an amended fraud defense sufficient to support document discovery related to Plaintiff's 2011-2016 financial information. Plaintiff may file a letter response by [1 week later], and Defendant may reply [1 week after that].
2. By [2 weeks], Defendant shall file affidavit(s) supporting its claim of common interest privilege. Plaintiff may file a letter response by [1 week later], and Defendant may reply [1 week after that].
3. In the meantime, the Court will hold in abeyance ruling on the discovery issues raised at Dkt. 95, 96, 97, 99, 100, 102.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Farsura v. QC Terme U.S. Corp

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 2022
21-cv-9030 (AT) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Farsura v. QC Terme U.S. Corp

Case Details

Full title:STEFANO FARSURA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QC TERME UC CORP, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 28, 2022

Citations

21-cv-9030 (AT) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2022)