From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farsura v. QC Terme UC Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 22, 2022
21-cv-9030 (AT) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-9030 (AT) (RWL)

06-22-2022

STEFANO FARSURA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QC TERME UC CORP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

This order resolves the issues raised by Defendants in their June 10, 2022 letter concerning the response of non-party Victor Kiarsis to the Rule 45 Subpoena served on him on May 2, 2022. (See Dkt. 81.) Defendants' request concerning search terms applied by Plaintiffs is denied without prejudice as premature. Defendants' other requests are denied for principally the reasons stated in Plaintiffs' June 15, 2022 response at Dkt. 86.

SO ORDERED.

Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record.


Summaries of

Farsura v. QC Terme UC Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 22, 2022
21-cv-9030 (AT) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Farsura v. QC Terme UC Corp.

Case Details

Full title:STEFANO FARSURA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QC TERME UC CORP, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 22, 2022

Citations

21-cv-9030 (AT) (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)