From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrow v. Estock

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 13, 2022
Civil Action 2:19-cv-1162 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:19-cv-1162

01-13-2022

MARQUIS FARROW, Petitioner, v. LEE ESTOCK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, Respondent.


Hon. Maureen P. Kelly, J.

ORDER OF COURT

WILLIAM S. STICKMAN IV UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

AND NOW, this 13 day of January 2022, after Petitioner, Marquis Farrow, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF Nos. 1 and 4), and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly recommending that the Court dismiss the Petition for failure to prosecute given that Petitioner was released on parole without advising the Court of a forwarding address (ECF No. 29), and after granting Petitioner a period of time to file written objections thereto (ECF No. 29), and having received no objections, the Court hereby ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Kelly's Report and Recommendation as its Opinion.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF Nos. 1 and 4) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this CASE CLOSED.


Summaries of

Farrow v. Estock

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 13, 2022
Civil Action 2:19-cv-1162 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Farrow v. Estock

Case Details

Full title:MARQUIS FARROW, Petitioner, v. LEE ESTOCK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 13, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:19-cv-1162 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2022)