From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farro v. Pino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in precluding the defense counsel from cross-examining the plaintiff about an unrelated action in which she sought to recover damages for different injuries than those for which she sought to recover damages in the instant action (see, Feldsberg v. Nitschke, 49 N.Y.2d 636; see also, Di Paolo v. Somma, 111 A.D.2d 899).

The appellant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Farro v. Pino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Farro v. Pino

Case Details

Full title:FILOMENA FARRO, Respondent, v. ROSARIA C. PINO, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 804