From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrer v. Piecuch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1952
279 App. Div. 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

March 12, 1952.

Present — Taylor, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.


Motion for permission to make motion for reargument granted. Motion for reargument denied; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Memorandum: In view of the extraordinary circumstances set forth in appellants' moving papers, we have again given careful consideration to the original record. We call attention to our decision, wherein we held that, while the respondents could maintain the action in trespass for damages, we could not and did not pass upon or determine the rights of any of the parties in and to the disputed or "filled-in" area. Such rights may properly be determined in an action brought for that purpose.


Summaries of

Farrer v. Piecuch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1952
279 App. Div. 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Farrer v. Piecuch

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL E. FARRER et al., Respondents, v. JOSEPH PIECUCH et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Farrer v. Piecuch

The answer denies the material allegations of the complaint, pleads a counterclaim for damages arising out of…