From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrelly v. John Roebling's Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

October, 1933.


Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We find no adequate reason in the record for declaring a mistrial. Moreover the court was without power to impose upon the defendants the obligation to pay the sums fixed in the order. The nonsuit granted before the mistrial is a further bar to the order so far as it related to the defendant as to which the nonsuit was granted. All concur; Edgcomb, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Farrelly v. John Roebling's Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Farrelly v. John Roebling's Sons

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH FARRELLY, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. JOHN ROEBLING'S SONS and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1933

Citations

240 App. Div. 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)