From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrell v. Inserra

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 16, 2011
9:10-CV-0434 (LEK/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2011)

Opinion

9:10-CV-0434 (LEK/ATB).

May 16, 2011


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on April 21, 2011, by the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 16).

Within fourteen days after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1(c). No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 16) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further

ORDERED, that Farrell's Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that a certificate of appealability is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Farrell v. Inserra

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 16, 2011
9:10-CV-0434 (LEK/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Farrell v. Inserra

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN M. FARRELL, Petitioner, v. THEODORE A. INSERRA, Superintendent…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: May 16, 2011

Citations

9:10-CV-0434 (LEK/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. May. 16, 2011)

Citing Cases

Andujar v. Kickbush

See e.g. Curtis v. United States, No. 98-CV-4245, 1998 WL 34304660, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. 1998) (holding that…