From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrell v. Fla. Republicans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Aug 19, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-140-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Aug. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-cv-140-FtM-29DNF

08-19-2013

PATRICK LORNE FARRELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF FLORIDA REPUBLICANS, RICK SCOTT, Governor, PAM BONDI, Attorney General, JOHN STUMPF, Wells Fargo CEO, Brian Moynihan, BOA CEO, THOMAS MARANO, GMACM CEO, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL, RICHARD J. JOHNSON, JOSEPH R. TOMKINSON, WILLIAM ERBEY, OCWEN CEO, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, BANK OF AMERICA, IMPAC SECURED ASSETS, IMPAC FUNDING CORP., GMACM, WELLS FARGO BANK, LEE COUNTY SHERIFF, STATE ATTORNEY, 20th Circuit, CIRCUIT JUDGES OF THE 20TH CIRCUIT, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #55), filed July 9, 2013, recommending that plaintiff's Motion to Add Defendant and Cause of Action (Doc. #44) be denied. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994)(Table).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge that the requested amendment would be futile.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #55) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Add Defendant and Cause of Action (Doc. #44) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 19th day of August, 2013.

____________________

JOHN E. STEELE

United States District Judge
Copies:
Hon. Douglas N. Frazier
United States Magistrate Judge
Parties of Record


Summaries of

Farrell v. Fla. Republicans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Aug 19, 2013
Case No. 2:13-cv-140-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Aug. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Farrell v. Fla. Republicans

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK LORNE FARRELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF FLORIDA REPUBLICANS, RICK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 19, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:13-cv-140-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Aug. 19, 2013)

Citing Cases

Lee Mem'l Health Sys. v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.

Permissible reasons which justify denial include "futility of amendment," Foman, 371 U.S. at 182, and an…