From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrell v. City of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 12, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01727-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 12, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-cv-01727-BNB

08-12-2014

TERRANCE FARRELL, Plaintiff, v. DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, MEDICAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE DDC PATIENT ADVOCATE OF DENVER HEALTH, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, DOCTOR GREG KELLERMEYER, and GARY WILSON, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Terrance Farrell, is in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections at the Bent County Correctional Facility in Las Animas, Colorado. Plaintiff initiated this action by filing pro se a Prisoner Complaint and a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On June 23, 2014, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order and directed Plaintiff to cure a certain deficiency in the pleading. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland directed Plaintiff to provide his signature where required on the Complaint form.

Magistrate Judge Boland warned Plaintiff that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to cure the deficiency within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Amended Prisoner Complaint, but the Complaint did not contain a signature page or a signature by Plaintiff. The Court, therefore, will dismiss this action for failure to cure the noted deficiency.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $505.00 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to cure the deficiency and for failure to prosecute. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, ECF No. 2, is denied as moot. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 12th day of August, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Farrell v. City of Denver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 12, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01727-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Farrell v. City of Denver

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE FARRELL, Plaintiff, v. DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 12, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-cv-01727-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 12, 2014)