From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrell v. Cayuga County Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 2001
288 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

(1231.2) CAE 01-02111.

November 9, 2001.

(Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J. — Election Law.)

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, KEHOE AND GORSKI, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly denied the petition seeking an order compelling respondents to invalidate the nominating petitions of the Common Sense Party on the ground that they were not filed by the August 21, 2001 deadline ( see, Election Law § 1-106; Matter of Hutson v. Bass, 54 N.Y.2d 772, 774). Although the nominating petitions filed with respondent Board of Elections were not time-stamped, the court credited the testimony of respondents' witnesses at the hearing on the petition and found that the nominating petitions were timely filed. Affording due deference to the credibility determinations of the court ( see generally, Peters v. Nicotera, 248 A.D.2d 969, 970; Parone v. Rivers, 84 A.D.2d 686), we conclude that the petition was properly denied.


Summaries of

Farrell v. Cayuga County Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 9, 2001
288 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Farrell v. Cayuga County Board of Elections

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF FREDERICK J. FARRELL, III, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CAYUGA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 9, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 437

Citing Cases

Monto v. Zeigler

While such evidence may warrant invalidation of a designating petition (see Matter ofHaskell v. Gargiulo, 51…

Hennessy v. Bd. of Elections of Cnty. of Oneida

of the signers identifying their signatures (seeMatter of Romaine v. Suffolk County Bd. of Elections , 65…