From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrell Lines Inc. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1968
29 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

March 5, 1968


Order entered October 11, 1967, granting issuance of a commission on written questions unanimously modified, on the facts and the law and as a matter of discretion, to provide that on plaintiff's option the examination of the witness may be had on open commission, each party to pay his own expenses which may be taxed as costs against the losing party, and as so modified affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The procedure indicated in the dispositive sentence is that prevailing in this Department where an examination upon interrogatories is objected to on the ground that an oral examination is more desirable ( Walborsky v. Wolf, 28 A.D.2d 1120; Pakter v. Lilly Co., 19 A.D.2d 810; Piel v. Lilly Co., 19 A.D.2d 810). Settle order on notice.

Concur — Stevens, J.P., Steuer, Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Farrell Lines Inc. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1968
29 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Farrell Lines Inc. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:FARRELL LINES INCORPORATED, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Bosurgi v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.

Order, entered March 4, 1968, granting plaintiffs' motion for a protective order, vacating defendant's notice…