From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farrar v. Misch

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 30, 2024
SC 167169 (Mich. Oct. 30, 2024)

Opinion

SC 167169 COA 364360

10-30-2024

CANDIE LEE FARRAR, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF NICOLE RAE KENWORTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JODY MISCH, Defendant-Appellee.


Muskegon CC: 2021-004152-NO

Elizabeth T. Clement, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Megan K. Cavanagh Elizabeth M. Welch Kyra H. Bolden, Justices

ORDER

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2024 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals failed to consider whether plaintiff's ordinary negligence claim was a "separate claim grounded on an independent theory of liability based on the defendant's conduct." See Laier v Kitchen, 266 Mich.App. 482, 493 (2005); see also Kachudas v Invaders Self Auto Wash, Inc, 486 Mich. 913 (2010). We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to consider whether plaintiff's negligence claim based on failure to rescue was separate and distinct from the pleaded premises liability claim. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

ZAHRA and VIVIANO, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

Farrar v. Misch

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 30, 2024
SC 167169 (Mich. Oct. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Farrar v. Misch

Case Details

Full title:CANDIE LEE FARRAR, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF NICOLE RAE…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 30, 2024

Citations

SC 167169 (Mich. Oct. 30, 2024)