From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faro v. Transamerica Insurance

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 29, 1981
54 N.Y.2d 647 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Decided June 29, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, HAROLD HYMAN, J.

Victor Bleiwas for appellant.

Martin Rosen for respondent.


On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the arbitrator's award was without basis in the evidence or was not otherwise grounded in reason (see Matter of Furstenberg [ Aetna Cas. Sur. Co.], 49 N.Y.2d 757).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Faro v. Transamerica Insurance

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 29, 1981
54 N.Y.2d 647 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Faro v. Transamerica Insurance

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK FARO, Respondent, v. TRANSAMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 29, 1981

Citations

54 N.Y.2d 647 (N.Y. 1981)
442 N.Y.S.2d 507
425 N.E.2d 896

Citing Cases

Prainito v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co.

We cannot say "that the arbitrator's award was without basis in the evidence or was not otherwise grounded in…

Kellogg v. Mich. Millers Mut. Ins. Co.

Some authority suggests that Kellogg's engagement of the tow truck might be considered to fall outside the…