From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farnsworth v. Palmquist

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Jan 5, 2009
CASE NO. C08-0851-JCC-MAT (W.D. Wash. Jan. 5, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. C08-0851-JCC-MAT.

January 5, 2009


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME


Plaintiff filed an unopposed motion to extend time to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss. (Dkt 38.) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 35) was originally noted for consideration on December 19, 2008. Plaintiff sought to renote the motion to January 2, 2009, stating that he had been unable to access the prison law library and would have better access to legal materials after a transfer to a halfway house on December 19, 2008. The Court notes, sua sponte, that inclement weather caused the closure of the Western District of Washington for four days in late-December 2008.

The Court GRANTS plaintiff's unopposed motion to extend time. (Dkt. 38.) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 35) is RENOTED for January 26, 2009. Plaintiff must file his response by Monday, January 22, 2008, and defendants' reply is due on the noting date.


Summaries of

Farnsworth v. Palmquist

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Jan 5, 2009
CASE NO. C08-0851-JCC-MAT (W.D. Wash. Jan. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Farnsworth v. Palmquist

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES V. FARNSWORTH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT J. PALMQUIST, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Jan 5, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. C08-0851-JCC-MAT (W.D. Wash. Jan. 5, 2009)