Opinion
(6486)
Argued October 20, 1988
Decision released December 13, 1988
Appeal from a decision by the named defendant granting an application by the defendant Metropolitan District Commission for a water diversion permit, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford, where the court, L. Dorsey, J., granted the motion to dismiss filed by the defendant Metropolitan District Commission and rendered judgment thereon, from which the plaintiffs appealed to this court. No error.
John L. Laudati, with whom, on the brief, was Philip N. Walker, for the appellants (plaintiffs).
Robert B. Teitelman, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Joseph I. Lieberman, attorney general, and Robert E. Walsh, assistant attorney general, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).
Lawrence J. Golden, for the appellee (defendant Metropolitan District Commission).
This case is controlled by Donis v. Board of Examiners in Podiatry, 207 Conn. 674, 542 A.2d 726 (1988). In Donis, the Supreme Court held that the department of health services was a party of record to the administrative proceeding and was therefore required to be cited and served as a defendant in the appeal. In this case, the only "service" upon the department of health services was personal service to a planning analyst. Moreover, that service was beyond the thirty day statutory period. This is improper service upon the department, who was a party of record within the meaning of General Statutes 4-183 (b). The appeal provisions of General Statutes 4-183 are jurisdictional in nature, and, if not complied with, render the appeal subject to dismissal. Donis v. Board of Examiners in Podiatry, supra, 683. The trial court did not err in granting the motion to dismiss the appeal.