From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. Wolfe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 3, 2023
No. 23-6589 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2023)

Opinion

23-6589

10-03-2023

THOMAS LEE FARMER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. R.M. WOLFE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Thomas Lee Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 28, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00147-JPB-JPM)

Thomas Lee Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Thomas Lee Farmer appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Hendrix, 143 S.Ct. 1857, 1867-69 (2023) (holding that a petitioner cannot use § 2241 petition to mount successive collateral challenges to federal convictions or sentences), we conclude that Farmer cannot pursue his claims in a § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order dismissing Farmer's § 2241 petition. Farmer v. Wolfe, No. 5:21-cv-00147-JPB-JPM (N.D. W.Va. May 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Farmer v. Wolfe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 3, 2023
No. 23-6589 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Farmer v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS LEE FARMER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. R.M. WOLFE, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 3, 2023

Citations

No. 23-6589 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2023)