From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. Upchurch

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Nov 30, 2021
1:21-CV-153-TAV-SKL (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-CV-153-TAV-SKL

11-30-2021

BENJAMIN BRILEY FARMER, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD L. UPCHURCH, J. CURTIS SMITH, DANIEL H. RADER IV, and STACY H. FARMER, Defendants.


ORDER

THOMAS A. VARLAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

For the reasons set forth in the Court's memorandum opinion, filed contemporaneously with this Order, defendants' motions to dismiss [Docs. 24, 28, 34, and 36] are GRANTED. Attorney Radar's motion to withdraw a portion of his motion to dismiss [Doc. 55] is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Farmer v. Upchurch

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Nov 30, 2021
1:21-CV-153-TAV-SKL (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Farmer v. Upchurch

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN BRILEY FARMER, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD L. UPCHURCH, J. CURTIS SMITH…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

1:21-CV-153-TAV-SKL (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2021)