From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. The Cnty. of Westchester

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 1, 2022
18 CIVIL 2691 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 1, 2022)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 2691 (NSR)

09-01-2022

TYRONE FARMER, Plaintiff, v. THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, THE CITY OF PEEKSKILL, ERIC JOHANSEN, PAMELA SGROI, JANE OR JOHN DOE ACCESS OFFICER, SGT. HENDERLONG, OFFICER VAZEO, and OFFICER SEAN ECHOLS, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 30, 2022, the Court GRANTED the County and the City Defendants' motions to dismiss and DISMISSED pro se Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint in its entirety without leave to replead. The Court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962), judgement is entered; accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

Farmer v. The Cnty. of Westchester

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 1, 2022
18 CIVIL 2691 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Farmer v. The Cnty. of Westchester

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE FARMER, Plaintiff, v. THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, THE CITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 1, 2022

Citations

18 CIVIL 2691 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 1, 2022)